How information technology can be used to increase the accountability of leaders and representatives
Syndiquer le contenu
Portrait de kantin
** The following is an eNewsletter from http://www.humanrightstools.org **
Dear readers,
This is the first of two newsletters on the same topic: how information technology can be used to increase the accountability of leaders and representatives.
Have you ever wondered what your nation is saying at the United Nations? How its voting on particular issues? Find out what by visiting UN Democracy, which gives easy access to the transcripts of the General Assembly and Security Council:
http://www.undemocracy.com/
As an example, it makes it easy to read what President Ahmadinejad or President Bush have been saying during recent speeches:
http://www.undemocracy.com/Iran/ahmadinejad
http://www.undemocracy.com/United_States/bush
It also makes it much easier to find document like resolutions and statements, for example below the Security Council documents are sorted by year and by topic:
Year:
http://www.undemocracy.com/securitycouncil/documents
Topic: http://www.undemocracy.com/securitycouncil
We caught up with the team who put this amazing resource together, Julian Todd and Francis Irving. We found out that behind this website is a group of dedicated volunteers, who put this together on a shoestring budget, with nothing else than ingenuity, hard work, and superb activist motivation! OK, and now for the interview:
Editors: How is this website meant to be used? What kind of information does it provide?
Francis: All the UN's documents are squirreled away on their hard to use websites, and make it actually impossible to send anyone links to a document, or find it with a search engine. UNDemocracy.com brings all that out into the open - putting the documents into Google, and letting you refer easily to a document.
Julian: By making them accessible to the general internet they can be referenced by research tools such as wikipedia. When you dig out facts buried in obscure reports, or come across the sorry official excuse given for a US vote against an overwhelmingly popular cause, it's important to be able to bring it to the attention of others who would be interested through the power of Web 2.0.
Editors: How is it done, technically? How do you keep it up to date? Are all the documents added by hand?
Francis: It's done automatically, by fancy software we wrote which parses the United Nations documents website, and loads the data into our website.
Julian: The PDF documents are pulled off their server with difficulty whenever they are found. For searchability, the General Assembly and Security Council meetings are converted into structured HTML using a program that starts with the pixel coordinates of every word on the page. Corrections have to be made by hand when names of countries are mistyped or titles are left out.
Editors: Who is behind this? Tell us a bit about the people who developed this website. What kind of financing did you have?
Francis: Nothing, it was built by one person, Julian Todd, with bits of help from others. He had the original idea, and does it in his spare time as a volunteer.
Julian: I paid for the server and bandwidth rental, which accounts for the only up-front cost of the whole project. You don't need money to do good things on the internet. All you need is a bit of imagination and the ability to ignore your family when they tell you that it is immoral to work for no pay.
Editors: What is your next project? If you had a million dollars to spend on a nonprofit idea, what would that be?
Francis: I don't have a new idea (bet Julian does) - but I'd still use the money usefully. To start off we'd make the UNDemocracy site even better - make it easier to use, and make it cover more documents. I'd next improve our other website Public Whip, making it easier for people to maintain voting analyses of MPs. (http://www.publicwhip.org.uk) I'd put the rest into a foundation to make sure both sites can be kept running reliably and be improved over time, as they deserve.
Julian: I am not someone who can convert money into productivity by other people. It would be better to give the money to someone who is probably able get people to work, for money if necessary, and send the keen ones in my direction for collaboration. There are people who can motivate, but can't program. And there are people who can program, but can't motivate.
Editors: Ok, thanks a lot for the interview, Francis and Julian, but thanks also for all the work you've been doing to produce this great resource. Both useful and inspiring!
For our readers, as usual, please forward this to your friends and colleagues who share your interest in human rights, or post it to your blog and mailing lists. If you have received this from a friend and would like to subscribe, you can do so here: http://www.humanrightstools.org/newsletter.htm
Best regards, and good luck in your efforts to defend or raise awareness about human rights.
Daniel D'Esposito, Editor
Human Rights Tools
editors [at] humanrightstools [dot] org
http://www.humanrightstools.org